In some circumstances, an escalation is a reasonable thing.  For example, parties may voluntarily exact a conflict in order to put pressure on the other party, involve third parties, or attract more people to their cause. Sometimes the most powerful party may not even see that there is a conflict; You may think that everything is fine. An escalation may be necessary to get them to participate in a debate about how to make things better for the other party suffering from oppression. This type of constructive escalation can have positive effects and help bring the parties into a mutually beneficial relationship.  Conflict theorists Dean Pruitt and Jeffrey Rubin list five changes that occur when conflict escalates. I`m sure your relationship will suffer if you escalate disagreements. In fact, hostile conflicts tend to escalate for trivial reasons and become unnecessarily violent.  Once victims have made exaggerated assessments of the severity of the damage suffered, they will likely take revenge. Their hostile acts often simply lead to an additional injustice that gives victim status to the original perpetrator.  Not only does this create new topics of conflict, but it also provokes new feelings of anger and injustice. Both parties may view revenge as an end in itself.  Thus, you avoid the escalation of disagreements in your relationship: these changes between individuals, groups and communities result from a prior escalation and contribute to a new escalation.
Once these transformations have taken place, the escalation tends to stop and repeat, and there is lasting damage in the relations between the parties. To limit the destructive effects of escalation, the parties must find a way to limit or reverse this process. Strategies to limit the escalation or de-escalation of conflict are needed and are discussed extensively in essays on these topics. Person A follows the same perceptual and angry behavior and continues to contribute to conflict management, as shown in the video above and the image below. (Click the image for a larger view.) I plan to review the specific things we can do to reverse this cycle in future contributions. For now, I leave you with this observation: anyone can take steps to defuse the conflict. Both sides will consider each other stubborn and doubt that the other side is serious about being part of the solution to this problem. However, at this stage, there is still some communication. This degenerates into a second stage if one or both parties lose faith that it can be resolved through fair debate. […] One of the common reasons for the escalation of conflicts is the perception of the threat that one or both sides see in the cycle of escalation of the conflict.
Taking an action that doesn`t make you threatening to the other person is a big step towards […] When we talk about the escalation of conflicts, we believe that the conflict is not only intensifying, but that tactics are intensifying. Changes in intensity are fueled by interactions and reactions, by external forces, and by the participation of more people – because when conflicts escalate, more people tend to engage. . . .